Just-in-Time Access Software
an independent guide to JIT access software
Subscribe
JIT Access — Head-to-Head

Delinea vs. ManageEngine PAM360

Both serve the buyer who isn't reaching for CyberArk or BeyondTrust, but they're priced and positioned for different points on that spectrum. Delinea is mid-to-large enterprise PAM with a lighter footprint than the category leaders. ManageEngine PAM360 is built for mid-tier IT departments that need foundational PAM and JIT at an accessible price point, not full enterprise-platform complexity.

The fault line between them

Delinea, formed from the Thycotic and Centrify merger, competes on user experience and deployment simplicity relative to CyberArk while still delivering enterprise-grade vault-centric PAM with real Linux/Unix depth. It's positioned for organizations that have outgrown basic password management tools but don't want CyberArk's professional-services-heavy deployment.

ManageEngine PAM360 sits a tier below that. It covers the foundational PAM workflow, password vaulting, infrastructure discovery, session recording, basic JIT, at a price point built for mid-tier IT departments rather than large enterprises. The tradeoff for that accessibility is JIT capability that's basic relative to both Delinea and the cloud-native specialists; PAM360 is not positioned as a match for large, complex enterprise environments.

CriteriaDelineaManageEngine PAM360
Architecture
JIT modelVault-centric JIT via Secret Server and Privilege ManagerBasic JIT workflows alongside password vaulting and session recording
Linux/Unix coverageStrong, inherited from the Centrify lineageStandard coverage; not a specialization
JIT capability depthFull hybrid PAM feature setBasic relative to cloud-native and enterprise PAM platforms
Fit and pricing
Price pointMid-to-large enterprise pricingCost-conscious; accessible for mid-tier IT budgets
Enterprise scale fitBuilt for mid-to-large enterprise environmentsNot a match for large, complex enterprise environments
Deployment complexityLighter than CyberArk, still a real PAM deploymentLower complexity, built for smaller IT teams to operate directly
Operational
Product line clarityThycotic/Centrify integration still settling; verify which line maps to your environmentSingle coherent product

Capability assessments based on publicly available vendor documentation and independent coverage. Validate specific feature depth against your environment before purchase.

When each wins

Delinea wins when
  • The organization is mid-to-large enterprise scale and needs a full hybrid PAM feature set
  • The Linux/Unix server fleet is a significant part of the privileged access problem
  • Budget supports enterprise PAM pricing, just with less overhead than CyberArk
ManageEngine PAM360 wins when
  • The IT department is mid-tier and needs foundational PAM at an accessible price
  • The organization isn't ready for enterprise-tier deployment complexity
  • Basic JIT and password vaulting cover the actual requirement, without deeper enterprise feature needs
Finding

This comparison resolves almost entirely on organizational scale and budget rather than architecture. Delinea is the right answer once an organization needs real enterprise PAM depth but wants to avoid CyberArk's overhead. ManageEngine PAM360 is the right answer for a mid-tier IT department that needs the foundational PAM and JIT workflow without paying for, or needing, enterprise-platform complexity. Buyers should size their actual requirement honestly before comparing these two on features.

Related: CyberArk vs. Delinea  ·  BeyondTrust vs. Delinea  ·  Full vendor comparison tool